Overall Score

4 stars - Click for rating criteria
Pros:
Rewards multiplayer teamwork; Superlative graphics
Cons:
Demands multiplayer teamwork; Not a viable single player game
  • Graphics 5 stars - Click for rating criteria
  • Sound 5 stars - Click for rating criteria
  • Gameplay 3 stars - Click for rating criteria
  • Story 2 stars - Click for rating criteria
  • Interface 4 stars - Click for rating criteria
  • Multiplayer 3 stars - Click for rating criteria

Get the tactical splendor of a strategy game with the pace and visuals of a shooter.

yahoo

By: Tom Chick

As a single player game, there's not a lot here. The campaign is a fairly goofy affair about a Soviet invasion via cargo container. Between cutscenes, Alec Baldwin reads ridiculously somber passages about the horrors of war. There are some entertainingly ridiculous moments (Valiant National Guardsman saves baby!) and even some licensed music, but the actual gameplay is a set of heavily scripted missions, designed to gradually introduce you to the different units and their powers. You can also play skirmish games against bots, but the main problem is the AI. It's incapable of playing the game in any meaningful way. Instead, it simply spits out units and runs them around willy-nilly, invariably in single file so they're easier to pick off one at a time. You might lose a game to the AI by being overwhelmed, but certainly not by being outsmarted.

It's disappointing that the three sides -- the USA, the USSR, and NATO -- are the same except for their accents and artwork. Also, there's a lot of nuance among the tactical powers that will be overwhelming to new players. You earn points as you play, which you can spend on a variety of special powers, most of which are various types of air strikes. By the time you've figured out and called in the right attack for any given situation, the situation will likely have changed. This part of the game isn't nearly as accessible as just shuffling units around and watching awesome graphics of stuff blowing up. But along with the need for teamwork, this is where World in Conflict shows its depth.

Ultimately, this depth, drawn partly from the interplay of units but mostly from the interplay of players, is what keeps the game going. As you're playing short match after short match, as easy and compelling as pulling another potato chip out of a bag, you'll get a sense for the group of people playing with you. It's very much the real time strategy equivalent of team-based shooters such as the Battlefield games, Team Fortress, or Quake Wars. That guy's good, that guy sucks, that guy's a lone wolf, that guy is new but he's trying, and that guy keeps killing me, so I'm gunning for him next.

In a way, World in Conflict is the opposite of what drives most real time strategy games. The idea behind a typical RTS is that you're looking down from a god's eye view, with complete and total control over all your units. It's the genre for control freaks. But that won't be the case here. Get used to helplessness, and get ready for an exciting new twist on real time strategy.

Page 2 of 2

Posted: 18 Sep 2007

World in Conflict
See Technical Info

Screenshots

World in ConflictWorld in Conflict

View Screenshots

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights Reserved. | Copyright/IP Policy | Terms of Service | Help

NOTICE: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our Privacy Policy